Why Covenant AI Left Bittensor

In an official statement, Covenant AI’s founder, Sam Dare, criticized Bittensor’s governance model, labeling it as ‘decentralization theatre.’ Dare highlighted inconsistencies between Bittensor’s stated goals and its operational practices, claiming that the network is not as decentralized as promised.

Covenant AI’s Achievements and Concerns

Despite its achievements, such as developing Covenant-72B, Covenant AI decided to leave due to alleged power struggles within Bittensor. Dare accused co-founder Jacob Steeves of undermining the network’s decentralization by asserting control over the subnet, which included suspending emissions and unilateral infrastructure changes.

Market Reaction and Future Plans

The departure announcement had immediate repercussions, with the TAO token plummeting by 15% within two hours. Covenant AI plans to continue its decentralized AI training efforts independently and is set to announce new projects soon.

Community Reactions and Industry Impact

The news has sparked varied reactions on social media, with some users criticizing Covenant AI’s approach. Meanwhile, Bittensor representatives have maintained optimism about the network’s future, suggesting the move could lead to more autonomous subnet operations.

Covenant AI’s exit highlights ongoing challenges in achieving true decentralization in blockchain networks, prompting stakeholders to consider governance models more critically.

The post Covenant AI’s Bold Exit: Top 3 Decentralization Concerns Exposed appeared first on Crypto Market Insights: Dive In with CryptoUpdate.io.